3. 3. 3. thinking drawing building
Aeneas van Waterschoot
Master Architectuur
2025 — 2026
studio
3(33)-33(3)-333 (t)huis
promotoren
Bart Hollanders
Jan Degeeter
medestudenten
Jonas Laurier
3.333.B 4. 10. BUILDING
3. 33.D 7. 0. SUMMER HOUSE 1:10
3. 3.C 7. 1. SACRED SPACE
3. 33.D 8. 0. PLAYGROUND DIJKSTRAAT 1:10
3. 33.D 6. 0. UPPER LAWN 1:10
3. 3. 3. thinking drawing building
These words are a subjective manifestation of an attitude. They describe a project which is not defined by an outcome, making it an ‘open-ended theory’. It is a process which aims to achieve neither results nor reach a conclusions. Instead, it is a quest by us (as makers) to develop a method for making architecture within a context that is both complex and, at the same time, non-existent.
““all what you do, should at the end still be a drawing” (de Vylder, 2026)
A DRAWING
ALL WHAT YOU DO SHOULD BE A DRAWING
A DRAWING AT THE END
THE END IS THE BEGINNING
ESCAPE THE END
BEGIN WITH A DRAWING
A DRAWING IS THE ESCAPE
The current state in which the profession of architecture finds itself is an end. Building no longer reflects the essence of the profession. As a result, architecture becomes interchangeable, implying that the current state of affairs marks the end of the discipline.
ESCAPE ATTEMPTS
ATTEMPT TO ESCAPE THE END
ESCAPE THE END TO BEGIN
Our process/escape is characterised by a constant interplay between three verbs. Three verbs that, for us, embody the essence of ‘making’.
THINKING – DRAWING – BUILDING
We think, draw and build. Verbs imply an action rather than a result. Thinking, drawing and building are all continuous processes. They are actions that evolve over a certain period of time, without ever reaching a final form.
As Sol said:
“29— The process is mechanical and should not be tampered with. It should run its course.”
(LeWitt, 1969)